AI Use Policy

My Android Gadgets may use generative AI tools to assist with drafting, editing, outlining, organizing information and producing selected visual assets. These tools can be useful production aids, but their output is not an authoritative source and does not replace editorial judgment. This policy explains the role those tools may play and the safeguards that apply to published work.

What AI May Assist With

AI tools can help turn a research outline into a readable draft, suggest a clearer structure, identify passages that need explanation, summarize material for editorial review or create an illustrative scene. They may also support workflow tasks such as organizing topics or drafting alternative phrasing.

Those uses do not establish that a technical claim is true. Generated text can be incomplete, outdated or fabricated. Before a factual claim is retained, it should be assessed against the underlying documentation and expressed at a level of confidence the evidence supports. Our Research & Sources Methodology describes the source standards used for technical content.

Editorial Responsibility Remains Human

Emily Parker is the named editor responsible for the publication’s editorial standards. AI assistance does not remove that responsibility or make an article a personal product endorsement. The editor’s role is to decide the scope of a guide, review evidence, make limitations clear and prevent generated language from being presented as proof.

We do not treat a chatbot response, generated citation or automated summary as an original source. When a guide relies on a document, the document itself—not an AI description of it—should be the basis for the claim. Where source material is insufficient, we should narrow the answer or tell readers what needs to be confirmed.

Images and Illustrations

Some cover images are AI-generated editorial scenes. When used, they are labeled as AI-generated and should be understood as illustrations of a context, not photographs of a product test, proof of ownership or evidence that a setup was measured. Technical diagrams are explanatory aids and are likewise not substitutes for source material or hands-on testing.

We aim not to use generated visuals or text in a way that makes an invented event, result or product relationship look documented. If a visual’s status is material to a reader’s interpretation, it should be disclosed near the visual rather than left to implication.

What This Policy Does Not Claim

This policy does not claim that every sentence or image has been produced with the same tool or reviewed in the same way. It sets the editorial boundary: AI can assist, but it is not the authority behind a technical conclusion. It also does not imply that My Android Gadgets has personally tested every product or configuration discussed.

AI tools and their capabilities change. We will revise this policy if the publication’s use changes in a way that materially affects readers’ understanding of how content or visuals are made. See Editorial Policy for the broader publication standard and Corrections Policy for how material errors and updates are handled.

Last updated: September 6, 2026.